Computer Vision

Building a Visual System for Machines — Introducing Compound Eye

We enable robots to understand the world in 3D using automotive-grade cameras, delivering ten times the resolution and range of other sensors while consuming less power.

By
Jason Devitt
July 21, 2021

Welcome to Compound Eye. We're a team of 20 scientists and researchers who have spent five years building a visual system for machines: a combination of cameras, computers, and software that enable machines to perceive the world around them.  

Everything that moves - dogs, cats, people, or robots - must understand the world in 3D in order to move through it. There are approximately two million species of animal on Earth and nearly all rely upon vision for motion planning. Flies, scallops, and sparrows have relatively small brains, no lasers, and seem to get around fine. Still — teaching machines how to see the world like we do is a difficult task.

See us in real-time

Our online demo shows the real-time performance of our vision system. The seemingly normal video is actually a point cloud, a true 3D representation of the world in front of the car. You can explore the point cloud by changing the perspective and measure the distance to any point in the scene by using the ruler tool in the top right. If you sign in with an email, you can access additional demos, including live streams from our test vehicles streaming from Houston and San Francisco almost every day of the week.

Interact with our real-time streaming demo.

How it Works

Our visual system uses standard automotive-grade image sensors. The software runs on an embedded GPU, delivering ten times the resolution and range of most lidar sensors while consuming less power. We're not here to fight wars over lidar and vision. Our goal is to build a fully redundant perception system for autonomous vehicles and other robots using only cameras, and that means measuring depth independently of other sensors.

We're not here to fight wars over lidar and vision. Our goal is to build a fully redundant perception system for autonomous vehicles and other robots using only cameras, and that means measuring depth independently of other sensors.

There are two main ways that humans and other animals perceive the world in 3D: semantic cues and parallax cues. Compound Eye uses both.

Semantic Cues

You can reason about distance from a single image - or by standing still and looking at the world with only one eye open - because you have prior knowledge about the world. For example:

  • You know the true size of cars and cats so you can tell out how far away they are from their apparent size in the image.
  • You know the ground is usually flat and recedes towards the horizon and that can tell you the distance to every object on the ground.
  • One object that partly blocks your view of another must be closer to you.

There are many other clues that people learn. Neural networks can also learn them given enough training data. But there are limits: Most things don’t come in standard sizes; sometimes the ground is not flat; unless you are looking at a line of cars or people, the objects in a picture are not all overlapping. In fact, it is mathematically impossible to figure out the geometry of most scenes from a single image or stationary video camera. Not just difficult - impossible. Fortunately, there is parallax.

Parallax Cues

Given two views of a scene from slightly different perspectives, you can calculate the distance to any point by triangulation. You don’t need to know anything else about what you are looking at; you just need to find the same point in each view.

One camera is enough, provided it is moving. Between images, nearby objects appear to move very quickly and those that are far away do not move at all. By keeping track of all the objects and motion, you can recover the exact geometry of the scene.

An example of motion parallax: nearby objects move quickly and distant objects move slowly.

Neural networks can learn how to do this too, but there’s a limit. Think about a blank wall in a warehouse, a resurfaced road, or a clear sky - every point looks the same. Shiny cars can look quite different from different angles, which makes it hard to find the same point in two images. Some parts of the scene may only be visible in one image.

Compound Eye uses both semantic and parallax cues

Semantic and parallax cues provide different and complementary information. It’s not possible to find the exact same point in two images of a clear blue sky (parallax), but it’s easy to identify the sky and know that it is very far away (semantics). A car may look quite different in two different images (parallax), but it’s easy to recover the geometry of a car from one image (semantics). On the other hand, it’s hard to tell the difference between a person and a picture of a person given a single image, which is why some cars think they see pedestrians on billboards (semantics). But with two different views, it’s easy to tell that a billboard is flat (parallax). Given a single image, a neural network will assume the ground is flat (semantics), but given two it can measure the shape of the ground exactly (parallax).

Animals rely on binocular vision for depth estimation and monocular vision for peripheral information.

One camera or two?

Again, all this is possible with a single camera, provided the camera moves and the scene stays still. For autonomous vehicles and many other robots, this is not realistic. Cars stop in traffic, at intersections, and before merging onto highways. When vehicles stop, their cameras stop moving too, which means they lose all depth perception from motion parallax. Drivers who have lost vision in one eye can move their heads from side to side, but car-mounted cameras don't move.

Whether or not a car is moving, other road users are always in motion. It's not possible to triangulate the distance to an object if it moves between two frames of video. If a one-eyed driver matches speed with the car in front (so that it is relatively stationary), they can judge the distance by moving their head. Car-mounted cameras don’t move, and even if they did, tracking dozens of moving objects in this manner is difficult.

This is one reason why humans and most other animals have two forward-facing eyes. Given two images of a scene captured at the same time, motion does not matter. Two cameras can freeze time. In our online demos, watch for moments when the car stops at a crosswalk or intersection and a moving object crosses our path. Depth measurement still works because the car has two cameras.

Two cameras are also necessary for redundancy. If there's a problem with one camera, a car or robot can get off the road or out of the way safely using the other one.

Putting it all together

Our demo uses two forward-facing cameras. Compound Eye’s vision system fuses information from three different sources of depth information: semantic cues from each frame, and parallax cues from both the motion of the cameras and the differences between the cameras.

Most of the time we take human vision for granted, but 3D perception is complex and difficult to replicate. Compound Eye's team of researchers and scientists have spent five years developing a new framework for performing parallax-based depth measurement and monocular deep learning at the same time using off-the-shelf components. If you’d like to learn more, contact us. And if you’d like to work on these problems, join us!

No items found.